>>467
バカだねぇソース元のありがたい言葉を貼っておくよw
参照データは同じなのに結論はお前と逆w何でだろうねぇw

Anyhow, these databases can certainly be expanded and further analysis can be done, but good luck finding the three-to-one rule in this data that results in the defender winning 50% of the time. It is clear that from 1600 to 1991 that the attacker won more often than not at two-to-one odds or even lower, depending on the period and the forces involved. There is really no historical evidence supporting the Army version of this rule that I know of.